Drivers v The Law: The battle commences as couples swap penalty points
Filed under: Travel
Drivers are increasingly swapping penalty points with partners to avoid one of them getting a ban. Up and down the country, dodgy couples are illegally colluding, but the worst offenders are in London, where 7% of drivers admitted it. We know this from a survey by motor insurance company Direct Line, in which 2% nationally admitted talking a spouse into taking the rap for some dodgy driving. Three years ago, only 1.5% said they did it.
Drivers aged 18-35 are the most likely to go in for it, with 4% owning up.
Andy Goldby, director of motor underwriting at Direct Line, said: "Motorists are increasingly risking perverting the course of justice in order to maintain a clean licence, as well as to avoid a driving ban.However, trying to escape convictions by swapping points with another person is illegal and can lead to prosecution. Quite simply, it is not worth the risk."
But this isn't the only battle line being drawn between the authorities and motorists at the moment.
Those in North Lincolnshire are up in arms about the fact that they could soon be fined £20 by the local authority for leaving their car engines running while parked.
The council said the fines would only be given to "irresponsible drivers" if they kept their engines running needlessly for a long time and refused to switch them off when asked to do so.
In nearby York, three car owners had a bit of a shock when the floodwaters of the river Ouse receded. As soon as the cars were no longer under water, ticket inspectors gave them penalty notices because they were parked on double yellow lines.
Shaun Binns, landlord of the nearby Lowther pub, told the Daily Mail: "Normally you get people parking on there but they move them in time to avoid flooding. But in this case I think the river's come up very quickly and they must have been caught out.
"There are double yellow lines down there and I suppose you could say if you're not allowed to park there then you shouldn't, but the inspector must have seen the cars had been flooded and you'd think they'd have a bit of compassion."
Recent Posts
- Work drinks: make mine a double standard (29/7/2010)
- Move over Steptoe, we're all economising now (29/7/2010)
- Easyjet passengers have had enough (29/7/2010)
- British Gas profits not just a rip off (29/7/2010)
- House prices peak at Shakira's hip level (29/7/2010)



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
3-17-2010 @ 8:24PM
Zena said...
Andy Goldby please get off the Nanny State Bandwagon. Couples swap points, big deal. They still pay the fine which is all the state want anyway. I know of people who have done this to prevent an area sales manager who drives 80,000 miles a year from loosing his licence the wife took the points, can't say I blame her. Stating they are Perverting the Course Of Justice is insane, they haven't killed, rapped or kidnapped someone.
Reply
3-18-2010 @ 8:17AM
S B said...
So this sales manager drives 80 000 miles per year, yet hasn't yet learn't to drive within the road traffic act? I'd suggest he should get a chauffeur, then he wouldn't keep getting caught.. Please don't come back with an excuse, i've heard them all. If you get pulled, you should take the punishment, perverting the course of justice is a criminal offence. Presumably it's okay for every misdemeanour to be passed off to a spouse? Driving without insurance? Driving without a seatbelt? Using a mobile phone? Why should speeding be 'special'? The replies should be interesting!
3-18-2010 @ 6:04AM
h-palmer said...
If a salesman is driving 80,000 miles a year and STILL hasn't learned how to drive properly then he deserves to lose his licence. This is just another example of someone who doesn't think people need to take responsibility for their own actions. Pathetic.
3-17-2010 @ 8:49PM
Dave said...
North Licolshire is near to York - Where? On a map of northern Europe?!!!
Reply
3-18-2010 @ 3:42AM
robert said...
i thought every 1 done it,
Reply
3-18-2010 @ 5:40AM
SB said...
I think you mean... 'I thought everyone did it'
3-18-2010 @ 3:46AM
Keith said...
The penalty point system is used for every kind of technical offence. It is a discredited system
Keith
Reply
3-18-2010 @ 4:45AM
flipper said...
Why do motorists bleat and moan so much about getting caught? If you drive outside of the law, why should you not get punished. The law is there for the general good, even though it seems to be there in some peoples eyes to prevent them achieving their own selfish ends.
Without the law, and enforcement of that law, you end up with anarchy.
Reply
3-29-2010 @ 10:08AM
david said...
The motoring laws are there generally to bring money into our corrupt governments pockets to furnish their 4th or 5th homes. Unless someone drives so dangerously that they kill someone, then I do not see why other motorists who drive maybe slightly over the speed limits are getting treated the way they do. and the sad people who state that everyone should stick to the law clearly need to get a life, WE ARE NOT ALL PERFECT, unlike the police of course who do nothing wrong!!!!!!!!!!
3-18-2010 @ 5:28AM
Keith H said...
A couple of points (pun intended sadly)
1. You all pay for it as it pushes insurance up.
2. Will you defend the system (everyone did, Robert, not done) when one of your family is killed by a 15 pointer who 'shared' the points?
Get a grip!
Reply
3-18-2010 @ 6:15AM
Jim said...
You are ignorent Dave. You can't even spell North Lincolnshire correctly! It is to the south of the River Humber, and North of Lincolnshire, about 50 miles from York
Reply
3-18-2010 @ 7:21AM
Tony said...
I guess that IGNORANT is spelt differently up where you live
Ooooops :))))
Reply
3-18-2010 @ 7:22AM
Tony said...
I guess that IGNORANT is spelt differently up where you live
Ooooops :))))
Reply
3-18-2010 @ 11:30AM
cleverpolly said...
wow! are you all men on this comments page? Because I thought us women were supposed to be the catty ones! It just goes to show hey.
Reply
3-18-2010 @ 7:50AM
bristolian said...
I was in Court on Monday and got my £160.00 fine overturned because the speed camera partnership totally ignored the law , failed to serve a summons to court correctly, and then had the case heard 40 miles away from where i live ... I asked for the case to be relisted locally and the fine was overturned.
Oh, and my 'offence' was exceeding the speed limit by 6mph .. I am so fed up by officious red tape merchants that I have given up driving altogether ...
Reply
3-18-2010 @ 9:56PM
Sue said...
I got a ticket after visiting my parents who live near sutton park in the midlands. 40 in a 30.
The road has been 40mph for as long as i have been born, I know they fitted speed cameras. Obviously they were not making enough money from them & dropped the limit down to 30,
My other half said just pay it, But i refused & got my parents to check it out. The naughty council had failed to change the signs from the side road. I had to take time off work to take pictures and a video showing there was no way of knowing the limit was 30 the last sign said 40.
I had to take 4 days off work but i won. Parents said the signs were changed 2 days later. Wonder how many people paid up?
Reply
3-18-2010 @ 8:55AM
gumpo said...
Well, silly them for sharing points.......say you dont know which one of you was driving at the particular time and neither will get any points !!
Courts will not prosecute unles they have an offender, they won't prosecute both, as then they would know they were prosecuting one innocent person, and they can't do that !
Reply
3-18-2010 @ 9:45AM
Peter said...
In a recent court case they BOTH gots the points for trying this con.A clever judge indeed!!!
3-18-2010 @ 7:51PM
em said...
nice point , but if the registered owner of the vehicle cant say who was driving then he/she is liable for the fine and points.
3-18-2010 @ 6:32PM
Alan F said...
Another example of the current malaise - and not just on the roads - where those who are culpable, and know it, attempt to shift responsibility onto anyone else but themselves in order to prevent disruption to their own self-centred world.
To those who think such conduct is ok, I ask how sanguine they would remain if a driver, who should not currently be on the roads as a result of aggregating too many speeding penalty points, ended up entering their home through the front wall, having lost control of his car on a bend though excessive speed, yet again. It happened in a neighbouring village recently.
Reply