After the Budget, what's the damage?
Filed under: Taxes, Budgeting & Planning, Emergency Budget
Every Budget starts with some bonkers statistics about borrowing billions and paying trillions in interest on government debt. The figures get so huge that they start to lose their meaning. Likewise when the Chancellor gets to the detail of tax rises and spending cuts it's easy to get the overall picture - shopping will cost more, families will get less support, housing benefit is going to be reformed - but hard to know exactly what this means for our pockets. However, on day two, the details emerge from the depths of the HMRC, and it becomes clear just what the new measures will cost us.
There's actually some very good news on income tax and national insurance: anyone earning less than £50,000 will be at least marginally better off than they are right now, and anyone earning less than £150,000 will be better off than they would have been if Labour's promises had come to fruition.
Those on £20,000 will be £235 better off in the next tax year, and those on £30,000 will be £135 better off.
The details are:
Those earning £10,000 currently pay £1,175 in tax. They will pay £840 after next April, and £760 the following tax year.
Those earning £20,000 currently pay £4,275 in tax. They will pay £4,040 after next April, and £3,960 the following tax year
Those earning £30,000 currently pay £7,375 in tax. They will pay £7,240 after next April, and £7,160 the following year
Those earning £40,000 currently pay £10,475 in tax. They will pay £10,440 after next April, and £10,360 the following year
Those earning £50,000 currently pay £14,190 in tax. They will pay £14,405 after next April and £14,315 the following year
Those earning £75,000 currently pay £24,440 in tax. They will pay £24,905 after next April and £24,815 the following year
Those earning £100,000 currently pay £34,690 in tax. They will pay £35,405 after next April and £35,315 the following year
Those earning £150,000 currently pay £57,780 in tax. They will pay £59,395 after next April and £59,410 the following year
The bad news comes when you start to look at VAT.
To work out how much it's going to cost you, you have to know roughly how much you spend on VAT-rated goods. However, as a rough rule of thumb:
If you spend £13,400 a year it'll cost you £100 more a year
If you spend £16,600 a year it'll cost you £200 more a year
If you spend £23,100 a year it'll cost you £300 more a year
If you spend £31,600 a year it'll cost you just over £400 more
If you spend £38,100 a year it'll cost you just over £500 more
If you spend £49,500 it'll cost you around £850 more
The average hit is expected to be just over £300 a year.
On balance, therefore, if you make £20,000 and spend £16,600 a year on VAT-rated goods, you'll be £35 a year better off.
If you make £30 and spend £23,100 a year, you'll be £165 worse off.
Clearly the politicians have done a decent job of preparing us for the worst, because on first glance you can't help but be struck by the fact it could be worse.
Emergency Budget 2010
Read about how the speech unfolded and VOTE on how tough it actually was here.Recent Posts
- Buying a home may cost £30,600 more than you think (08/9/2010)
- New car temptations and pitfalls (08/9/2010)
- Facebook hacking scams pose ID theft risk (08/9/2010)
- The maths doesn't work: retirement must change (08/9/2010)
- Mortgage tips ahead of interest rate decision (08/9/2010)



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-23-2010 @ 4:46AM
John Charlesworth said...
Thanks for the note on how much VAT will affect different earnings bands. I think the meat of this budget is in the cuts to come in the Whitehall Departments: the top line figures/cuts in the budget were lless than expected and had probably been hyped up beforehand to do just that.
It will all filter down to local level where changes willl be made: At national level it wil be the reaction of workers in the Public Sector to frozen wages - will strikes occur? Also, politically it will be a test of political nerve especially for the LIbDems.
Reply
6-23-2010 @ 7:48AM
Yvonne said...
Yet again the people that get of their arse and go to work and earn between 20-35K are worse off, so Mr Cameron i earn a figure between these values am i in the poor category?, i know that old friends of mine that live in their council houses, can sit in the garden all day do a bit of shopping etc have more spare cash at the end of each week than i do working 40 hrs !! who's poor??? them or me ??? ME
Reply
6-23-2010 @ 12:54PM
steve said...
20-35k a year...lol. i wish i was in the poor catagory, as for people who get off there arse and go to work, some people dont have a choise. i have osteoarthritis in my lower spine and hips and i am in constant pain but i get tarred with the same brush as the idle t--ts that sit outside my local pub both dinner and night and dont want work. try living on £96.00 per week and see how mutch cash you have left at the end of the week, prob same as me f---k all. try cutting down on youre spending then you might have something left at the end of the week. after all if you cant save any money on 20-30k a year there,s something wrong
6-25-2010 @ 11:56AM
debbie said...
there the scroungers hun, but it gets worse than that, if you can convince the powers that be, that your dissabled, you can get a car renewed every 2 yrs, have it taxed & insured, free parkin, free dentist , the list is endless, & your the one that is helping to pay for it,
6-23-2010 @ 8:01AM
Geldolf said...
LOL I do not understand what all the fuss is about, average cost to families £300 a YEAR! That is nothing to moan about especially as its going to reduce our debt and improve our and our next generations lives.
Reply
6-23-2010 @ 9:18AM
Tim said...
Those income tax figures look very questionable to me.
Ignoring NI and other fiddly bits, if I'm on £10,000 I currently have a tax-free allowance of £6475, so I only pay tax on £3525, at 20% since I'm nowhere near the threshold. 20% of £3525 is £705 - nowhere near the £1175 suggested above.
Also, higher rate tax payers will be worse off under the new threshold ( http://bit.ly/aaONkU ), not better off, so the figures above seem to be nonsense.
Reply
6-23-2010 @ 1:14PM
John said...
Well Said 'Yvonne'. Steve does not realise how much worst off we are. I understand Steve's situation but Yvonne was making a fair and truthfull comment. We might earn that much and out of it we have to pay the full cost of everything. There is no spare to save. We have a Mortgage to pay etc. We dont get handouts like those sitting around all day and maybe make a bit on the side and get away with it.
People forget that a pack of butter to someone of the dole, is the same as someone thats not but unlike those that work, its not their money.
I work hard to pay for what I have. I cannot claim a council house, if I was to lose my job, I would be put in a B&B. What the goverment should do is re assess everybody making a claim, and means test them.
People in 3 bed council house that have no children should be put into a 1 bed house or flat. Theres a saving as when they claim the heating allowance in the winter, the tax payer would not have to supplement empty rooms.
They always look in the wrong place. If someone is claiming and able to work, they should be put out to work, be it sweeping the streets or anything like that for their money. At least I would see a return on my high tax's pay.
Reply
6-24-2010 @ 2:43AM
Dave Good said...
It seems to me that when the American building societies and banks went tits up and the same thing happened in Iceland ,the banks and building societies of this country followed .
The banks were then bailed out by the government with OUR money.
So when are the banks going to pay back the government and
put the country back on a even keel
For this we are all told that the country is in debt and we are all in the same boat and we are all taxed again to in therory pay back ourselves.
Reply
6-23-2010 @ 3:25PM
willie said...
i work and not in some cushy office or shop and i dont mind paying taxes as long as it for the poor and the out of work,and lets face it there is growing unemployment on a daily basis.What annoys me the most is the billions we give to the EU every year ,and the immigrants coming over here hoovering up british jobs that gets on my nerves they begin ok then get better treament than what we do for doing less they are sly and are not team players in the least and take hours to do the same job as we do i have worked with two latvians and they are the worst at least the polish are hard working and are truly a grateful nation but the eu should be scrapped if a country is going down the pan they should get out of trouble themselves,they are the real scroungers we are paying for .
Reply
6-23-2010 @ 4:21PM
sally said...
my idea of a fair budget would be to stop all family allowance to the rich & certainly to the children who don,t live in this country,stop the winter fuel allowance to the rich,as it is EVERYONE over retirement age automatically gets it - this is not fair - but the best one would be to stop ALL benefit payments,including housing to people who come to our country until they have worked & paid into the system for a min. of 5 years - it would save millions & also it would cut the immigration as more than half of them wouldn,t bother coming - get out of the e.u. - a few more millions saved - this budget would not affect any of us commoners & the rich wouldn,t miss their lack of family allowance nor their heating allowance.
Reply
6-23-2010 @ 4:39PM
ABELITO said...
I AM A PENSIONER WHO STRUGGLES SO I AM VERY GRATEFUL FOR THE FUEL ALLOWANCE HOWEVER I WAS SHOCKED TO FIND OUT THAT ALL THE BRITS WHO WERE LUCKY ENOUGH TO RETIRE TO WARMER CLIMATES SUCH AS SPAIN ALSO GET THE FUEL ALLOWANCE WITCH I FIND LUDICROUS AND SHOULD DEFINATELY BE STOPPED.
Reply
6-23-2010 @ 5:48PM
J said...
what I don't get is with the country being in the state it's in, why are the taxpayers still paying the queen 7.9million a year!!!! surely with everthing she owns she could sell off some of her treasures and help get us out of this hole... And have you seen the houses members of the government get to live in, worth an absolute forturne if I don't say so myself, sell them off and stop living off the people as well as ruining half their lives.... And yes totally agree with sally. Stop paying benefits to people who either don't live in the country or have only been here for 5 minutes.
Reply
6-23-2010 @ 6:03PM
Super Sparks said...
Anyone any ideas on how to put Gordon Brown on trial for treason or doens't almost bankrupting the Country count for anything? Maybe he should have completely bankr upted the Country and then we could stand him and his hechmen on trial for treason?
Suppose their excuse would be, "I was only obeying orders" and Gordon would do the honorable thing and blow his brains out before the trial?
Some hope.....
Reply
6-24-2010 @ 1:47PM
Amanda said...
I work in a residential home were some pay the full fees to live there and some only get half of thier fees paid depending on how much you managed to save along the way,but all get winter fuel allowances and most get the full amount because ages range between 80 and 100 years old problem is the home does not get any of this money so the residents can do with this what ever they please we have at best 38 residents so you can imagine the cost of this to us the tax payer year in and out unbelievable this allowance should be a means tested benefit and for elderly people who live in thier own homes because heating in nursing homes and residential care is already included in the fees .This is another example why this country is in such financial trouble.
Reply
6-24-2010 @ 9:48AM
lynn said...
J
the queen doesn't own that much now. George III gave all crown assets to the state in return for the Civil List payments. If he hadn't then Her Maj would probably been better off since he probably owned most of London at the time. Also I would rather my 79p went to the Queen than all the money "First Lady-make mine a freebie- Cherie Blair when it suits me- Booth" hoovered up in 11 years, along with two jags, Lord of punching constituents is going to hoover up now and Lord Voldermort sorry Lord Mandelson thats the kind of scum we would get in Buck House with a republic.
Reply
6-25-2010 @ 12:16PM
Dave Good said...
I forgot to add that if this country needs to save money we should end the war in Afghanistan and Iraq . How much money and lives would this save?
Reply
6-24-2010 @ 2:57AM
royb said...
Put Blair on trial as well for lying to get us into 2 wars we should never have been involved with.
Reply
6-25-2010 @ 12:16PM
debbie said...
well said Sally,
Reply
6-25-2010 @ 1:08PM
debbie said...
theres somethin wrong when someone can work for the NHS, have 6 mths off with so called depression,& get full pay,plus the nexy 6 mths at half pay,. not worked a full year for 5 yrs.. tax payers money again giive there job to someone that wants it i say
Reply
7-14-2010 @ 6:09PM
Dave Good said...
Have you heard of the new Tax that's coming? This is the new Immigration Tax bought in to help pay for the facilities that are provided and used by Immigrants to this country If they have stayed here for four years and over it's £12,000 Three years is £8000 Two years will be £4,000 and One year £2,000. on entry into Britain's wonderful country
This is to help pay for the added pressure on the Police,The Fire Service, Hospital Treatment, Water and Sewerage ,Street Lighting and Refuse Collection and all the other expenses that are incurred when we invite people here. Should it be more?
Reply