Beat the sneaky rail fare hikes
Filed under: Travel
Rail companies don't have a lot of fans. Cancelled services, delayed trains, poxy excuses, and those damn announcements. 'We apologise for any inconvenience that may have been caused' My train is two hours late, how on earth could there be any question over whether it has been an inconvenience? Yesterday they announced something that seemed like good news. Fares will rise just 1.1% this year, the lowest rise since privitisation. So are they turning a corner? Is there a brave new world where train tickets are reasonably priced and services are seemless.
Well, what do you think?


The train services dealt a harsh blow this week, when the full extent of the bank holiday disruption to the rail network emerged. Consumer groups argued that travellers deserved a discount for the fact their journey would take much longer, and rail companies did the corporate equivalent of shrugging and saying: "It's not my problem mate".
Each year, I'm one of thousands of people who make the pilgrimage to Edinburgh for the heady dose of arts, music and comedy that is the Fringe festival, and each year the train fare from London becomes a little bit more horrifying. There are other travel options, and they're far cheaper - but I flatly refuse to fly anywhere that isn't overseas, and having tried the coach once I know that the train is the only choice for me. I tend to buy my tickets second-hand. But why does the most obvious and sensible route have to be so prohibitively and inexplicably expensive?
I've definitely done more than my fair share of standing on public transport. I'm not talking about the daily commute where I get a little over familiar with my fellow city-dwellers. I mean the few hundred miles sitting on my overnight bag on the way to visit family, or on one particularly memorable Easter, when I spent 14 hours in a flooded train tunnel.
Last week, I 
